—Skip
Green Fire Times
info@sunbooks.com

Way to fire up the sustainability movement!

Nate Downey

Robert Montoya expounds the virtues of ICF for construction and casts aspersions on both wood and people who live in wood homes. While he asserts that ICF buildings will last for thousands of years, that is somewhat misleading, because ICF is relatively new and it presupposes the building will serve for 1000 years. I can point to wood buildings that HAVE lasted more than a thousand years, but have to qualify that by saying the buildings were designed to perform their function or allow for easy adaptability.

Sadly, in North America, more than 80% of buildings that were torn down were removed because they no longer performed the function the owner needed it to perform. The average house serves for 38 years because we as consumers want something different. Not because the material has failed. (This was from a study conducted by the Athena Institute, the organization selected by USGBC for its Life Cycle Assessment tool for use in LEED.)

This LCA tool also found that ICF buildings have a bigger environmental impact than wood frame (for residences and low-rise office buildings.)

There is no perfect building material. If there was we probably wouldn’t be having this discussion.

The task we face as designers and specifiers comes down to a few things:

1. What functions and capabilities need to be designed for in this building over the long term, say 100 years plus?;
2. What are the true impacts of my material, design and operational decisions over the same time frame and do I have a means of assessing current and future impacts of my decisions? (which necessitates an objective LCA tool);
3. Are my decisions likely going to allow the building to be adaptable to deal with future concerns and uses?
4. Does the building need to be built in the first place? I refer to the Summer 2007 edition of the National Trust Forum journal, in which architect Carl Elefante said ‘the greenest building is one that is already built’. I would respectfully argue that the greenest building is one that doesn’t HAVE to be built. If we can develop a culture that values our heritage, designs buildings that are endearing, and considers needs not wants, we will recognize we already have buildings that will meet our needs and be capable of lasting for centuries, regardless of the material.

Finally, what other material comes from what is essentially a solar powered carbon-dioxide sucking machine that stores energy in a beautiful building material? Wood.

I commend Mr. Montoya on his achievements in the green building field, but objectivity is going to play a key role in ensuring we make the right decisions over the long-term. I’d urge him to examine all materials shine and where they need work.

Peter Moonen
Leader, Sustainable Building Coalition

I’m Neal Jones, a media consultant, a radio and television broadcaster and meteorologist. I have been a member of the Union of Concerned Scientists for a few years now, and I’d like to coordinate our efforts in communication.

My background includes: Physics, University of Colorado; Broadcasting, Ron Bailie School of Broadcast; Graduate Marketing, Augusta College; On-air Meteorology, The Weather Channel (11 years). I don’t need to get into more at this moment… let me say, I’m enthusiastic in your project.
Sincerely,
Neal Jones
Coyote Cliffs
coyotecliffs@yahoo.com coyotecliffs@windstream.net coyotecliffs@live.com
http://wineshopathome.com/nealjones http://nealjones1.voice123.com

Green Fire Times is a much needed media resource for all of New Mexicans. I salute everyone that is apart of this visionary project!!!! I also love the cover pictures…..something you would want to put to decorate the walls…..!!!

thank you for putting this together

maceo